Message: previous - next
Month: October 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] more discussion

From: Jekyll Wu <adaptee@...>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:17:11 +0800
On 2012年10月16日 02:39, Darrell Anderson wrote:
> In practical terms, Trinity is a continuation of KDE 3.5.10

I'm sorry, but I have to say you(Trinity) are not. KDE promises binary 
compatibility and you(Trinity) breaks it. Is that called continuation ?

Pretending and disclaiming you are a continuation of KDE3 would 
eventually only bring more bad names to you(Trinity) and probably KDE.

Face and acknowledge the truth: You are a fork, and everybody already knows.

Seriously, is that so hard and shameful?