> > In practical terms, Trinity is a continuation of KDE 3.5.10
> 
> I'm sorry, but I have to say you(Trinity) are not. KDE
> promises binary compatibility and you(Trinity) breaks it. Is
> that called continuation ?
> 
> Pretending and disclaiming you are a continuation of KDE3
> would eventually only bring more bad names to you(Trinity)
> and probably KDE.
> 
> Face and acknowledge the truth: You are a fork, and
> everybody already knows.
> 
> Seriously, is that so hard and shameful?

Fair enough. Do you feel better now?

Darrell