Message: previous - next
Month: October 2012

Re: [trinity-devel] more discussion

From: Slávek Banko <slavek.banko@...>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:30:30 +0200
On Tuesday 16 of October 2012 00:17:11 Jekyll Wu wrote:
> On 2012年10月16日 02:39, Darrell Anderson wrote:
> > In practical terms, Trinity is a continuation of KDE 3.5.10
> I'm sorry, but I have to say you(Trinity) are not. KDE promises binary
> compatibility and you(Trinity) breaks it. Is that called continuation ?
> Pretending and disclaiming you are a continuation of KDE3 would
> eventually only bring more bad names to you(Trinity) and probably KDE.
> Face and acknowledge the truth: You are a fork, and everybody already
> knows.
> Seriously, is that so hard and shameful?
> Regards
> Jekyll

Are you sure it's broken binary compatibility? I use Twinkle compiled with KDE 
support. Binary is compiled against KDE 3.5.x libraries from Squeeze and QT3 
from Squeeze. And same unchanged binary working without any problems with the 
TDE 3.5.x libraries and QT3 from Trinity.