> I did not mean to imply porting from qt3 to qt4 precisely, I meant to
> the tqt framework. At least what I read made it sound like once the
> porting to the tqt framework was completely done that it there would
> no longer be a need for qt3 as a dependency. Was I wrong?

Everything in GIT now runs on the tqtinterface layer. Other than new ABI/API changes, there is no more related work to be performed. Historically, we went through a rough time with the overall conversion between 3.5.12 -> 3.5.13.1. Most if not all of those bugs were found and most of the patches have been back ported to 3.5.13.1 too.

We still maintain Qt3, mostly as a base and reference, but the preferred method of building packages is against TQt3. There will always be a dependency on one or the other, but as development continues, that dependency shifts more and more to TQt3. At least one package builds only against TQt3 and no longer builds against Qt3: tdebindings. There might be other packages, but I would not know because I have been building against TQt3 since the GIT migration almost a year ago.

> An idea for art:
> 1. A triquetra-type image of either penguins or overlapping circles
> or something (ideas welcome)
> 2. We could replace the shutdown, standby, and power buttons with
> images of a penguin's ace with eyes open, half-closed and sleeping.
> I could do these in 3D or in 2D.

The penguin is symbolically linked to the Linux kernel and the gnu is symbolically related to the gcc infrastructure. I think Trinity should have its own symbolic imagery. :)

A triquetra type image sounds interesting, but  where do you envision these images to be used? Are you thinking project logos at this point or other art work for packages?

I apologize for the top-posting of my last message (please forgive me)
and hopefully it is fixed here. It was not intentional, just tired.
However I also had another idea for some art, I cold also do a 3Dish
image where 3 balls overlap with their overlapping colors changing due
to the overlap.

Personally I don't care whether people top post or bottom post. I see both styles in my emails outside this list and I use whatever the other person uses. I have enough intelligence and patience to read either. So does everybody else here, but old customs die hard. :)