On 02/22/2011 11:41 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> <snip>
> 
> cc: arch-general
> 
>   Arch devs - Do you think this could be a packaging/patch issue with Arch, or
> do you think is going to be glibc itself? It looks like glibc to me, but I
> thought I'd ask first before going to the glibc folks.
> 
> 
We are homing in on the cause and a possible solution:

<quote>

glibc 2.13-4 introduced a patch from the Fedora glibc branch that is not
included in mainline glibc and fixes issues with prelink [1]. Obviously, this
has some side effects. Seems like it requires some more investigation.

[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22656

</quote>


-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.