On 02/22/2011 11:41 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > <snip> > > cc: arch-general > > Arch devs - Do you think this could be a packaging/patch issue with Arch, or > do you think is going to be glibc itself? It looks like glibc to me, but I > thought I'd ask first before going to the glibc folks. > > We are homing in on the cause and a possible solution: <quote> glibc 2.13-4 introduced a patch from the Fedora glibc branch that is not included in mainline glibc and fixes issues with prelink . Obviously, this has some side effects. Seems like it requires some more investigation.  https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22656 </quote> -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.