Hello, as pointed out by Fran�ois in bug report 1588, upower was previously named devicekit-power. And with corresponding dbus paths. I wonder what is the cost of dbus call? I hesitate to support devicekit-power as an second dbus paths for upower or as a standalone backend. What is your opinion? http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1588 Thanks, Slavek