On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:48:37 -0500 "Timothy Pearson" 
<kb9vqf@...> wrote:
>>>>> Should the kstyle directories and files be changed to 
>tdestyle?
>>>>>
>>>>Probably.  How much would that break at this point though
>>>>configuration wise?
>>>
>>>I don't know. I'm not complaining. :-) I only noticed the
>>>differences when I was responding to bug report 1609. Seems we
>>>have
>>>moved far with so much renaming and of late we have continued 
>some
>>>
>>>mopping up of those efforts. :-)
>>>
>>>A quick scan of modules that install files to
>>>$PREFIX/share/apps/kstyle:
>>>
>>>tdelibs
>>>tdebase
>>>tdeartwork
>>>tdesdk
>>>
>>>I don't have all packages installed right now so there might be 
>a
>>>few more.
>>>
>>>Other loose ends include renaming $TDEHOME/share/apps/kstyle-
>>>>tdestyle, where ever that is defined (tdelibs?), and r14-xdg-
>>>update. Probably other loose ends too.
>>>
>>>I notice when grepping the sources some internal functions of
>>>kstyle* still exist. tdebase/kpersonalizer has cpp files with
>>>kstyle8.
>>>
>>>I could hammer out and test the patches. The grunt work of the
>>>patches should go fine, but I'd need a some days of validating
>>>build runs and usability testing. If I get overwhelmed I holler.
>>>Probably first scream and cry, but eventually holler. :-)
>>
>> Creating patches went surprisingly smooth. The final list is 
>short:
>>
>> tdelibs
>> tdebase
>> tdeartwork
>> tdesdk
>> tde-style-lipstik
>> tde-style-qtcurve
>> koffice
>> tde-i18n
>>
>> I had no build errors. A superficial test of selecting the 
>styles
>> in kcontrol resulted in no errors or problems.
>>
>> Caveat: The tde-i18n patch is huge. So huge that I will not even
>> try to post the patch or try to push to git until I reduce to
>> smaller patches and push piece-meal one at a time.
>>
>> That said, how do we want to proceed next? I can post the 
>patches
>> online and somebody else could test. Or I could just push to git
>> and listen for screams of pain and anguish. No problems noticed
>> here, but I'm only one person with my own perspective.
>>
>> Darrell
>
>Slavek, can you handle updating the Debian/Ubuntu packaging files 
>for this change?

Am I supposed to push the patch set to git?

Darrell