Message: previous - next
Month: August 2013

Re: [trinity-devel] kstyle-tdestyle renaming --- update

From: "Darrell Anderson" <darrella@...>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:55:38 -0500
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:48:37 -0500 "Timothy Pearson" 
<kb9vqf@...> wrote:
>>>>> Should the kstyle directories and files be changed to 
>>>>Probably.  How much would that break at this point though
>>>>configuration wise?
>>>I don't know. I'm not complaining. :-) I only noticed the
>>>differences when I was responding to bug report 1609. Seems we
>>>moved far with so much renaming and of late we have continued 
>>>mopping up of those efforts. :-)
>>>A quick scan of modules that install files to
>>>I don't have all packages installed right now so there might be 
>>>few more.
>>>Other loose ends include renaming $TDEHOME/share/apps/kstyle-
>>>>tdestyle, where ever that is defined (tdelibs?), and r14-xdg-
>>>update. Probably other loose ends too.
>>>I notice when grepping the sources some internal functions of
>>>kstyle* still exist. tdebase/kpersonalizer has cpp files with
>>>I could hammer out and test the patches. The grunt work of the
>>>patches should go fine, but I'd need a some days of validating
>>>build runs and usability testing. If I get overwhelmed I holler.
>>>Probably first scream and cry, but eventually holler. :-)
>> Creating patches went surprisingly smooth. The final list is 
>> tdelibs
>> tdebase
>> tdeartwork
>> tdesdk
>> tde-style-lipstik
>> tde-style-qtcurve
>> koffice
>> tde-i18n
>> I had no build errors. A superficial test of selecting the 
>> in kcontrol resulted in no errors or problems.
>> Caveat: The tde-i18n patch is huge. So huge that I will not even
>> try to post the patch or try to push to git until I reduce to
>> smaller patches and push piece-meal one at a time.
>> That said, how do we want to proceed next? I can post the 
>> online and somebody else could test. Or I could just push to git
>> and listen for screams of pain and anguish. No problems noticed
>> here, but I'm only one person with my own perspective.
>> Darrell
>Slavek, can you handle updating the Debian/Ubuntu packaging files 
>for this change?

Am I supposed to push the patch set to git?