trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: November 2013

Re: [trinity-devel] Conflicts in packages qt3 × tqt3

From: Slávek Banko <slavek.banko@...>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 01:53:15 +0100
On Thursday 07 of November 2013 00:01:55 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 of October 2013 22:04:32 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> >> > Hello all, Tim,
> >> >
> >> > in a recent test of upgrade from TDE 3.5.13.2 to R14 smooth update was
> >> > thwarted by conflicts in packages qt3 × tqt3. How should they be
> >>
> >> treated?
> >>
> >> > Rename files to prevent conflicts? Or mark packages as conflicting /
> >> > replacement to allow smooth upgrade?
> >>
> >> We may need to rename the files, though this would push release back yet
> >> again.  My primary concern is the complaints we would get if we blocked
> >> installation of Qt3 on TDE systems via the Conflicts package field.
> >>
> >> At first glance the files listed are not used by the majority of TDE
> >> applications, so renaming them might not be as bad as it first looks.
> >> Let
> >> me see what I can do with it.
> >>
> >> Tim
> >
> > I believe that it would be good to resolve this conflicts before release
> > RC1.
> > Should I help?
> >
> > Slavek
>
> I just pushed through a commit that should resolve the majority of these
> issues.  I don't know if the TDE sources will need to be updated anywhere
> to handle these changes; can you take a look?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tim
>

I was looking for using renamed tools in the entire GIT tree, and I did not 
find anything where were actively used. So it looks good.

Slavek