On Thursday 06 of February 2014 16:46:25 David C. Rankin wrote: > On 02/05/2014 07:42 PM, Slávek Banko wrote: > > Have you tried to sip4-tqt add patch 1912 (sip4-tqt : install as module > > by default) from bug 1790? If patch 1912 is correct, the files should be > > installed in a subfolder sip4_tqt. As follows: > > > > tde-sip-R14preRC1-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz > > usr/include/python3.3m/sip.h > > usr/share/licenses/tde-sip/LICENSE > > usr/bin/sip > > usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/sip4_tqt/__init__.py > > usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/sip4_tqt/sip.so > > usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/sip4_tqt/sipconfig.py > > usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/sip4_tqt/sipdistutils.py > > > > tde-sip4-tqt-R14preRC1-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz > > usr/include/python2.7/sip.h > > usr/share/licenses/tde-sip4-tqt/LICENSE > > usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sip4_tqt/__init__.py > > usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sip4_tqt/sip.so > > usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sip4_tqt/sipconfig.py > > usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sip4_tqt/sipdistutils.py > > > > Slavek > > Thank you Slavek, > > I have it sorted. I see the subfolder move, but do not understand why > using sip as a module instead of an executable is preferred. However, I see > the benefit in resolving the conflict with upstream sip. I've simply been > replacing the upstream 'sip' provided file with 'tde-sip' since I was > building with upstream anyway. It was just frustrating to be cramped on > time and then to run into dependency packages changing locations in the > filesystem. The decisive reason for the move to the modules have been just avoid conflict with the standard 'sip' and 'python-qt'. I assume that both patches (1912, 1913) from bug 1790 can be considered as tested => suitable for pushing to Git. Slavek --