I wouldn't keep it around because half is also unmaintained. Who are we talking about? BSD?

On Feb 17, 2014 8:29 AM, "Calvin Morrison" <mutantturkey@...> wrote:

I doggy

On Feb 16, 2014 9:06 AM, "Slávek Banko" <slavek.banko@...> wrote:
On Sunday 16 of February 2014 12:58:55 Michele Calgaro wrote:
> >With knetworkmanager8 is another problem. As I recently discovered with
> >dismay, backend for NetworkManager in tdehw-lib only supports
> > NetworkManager 9 and later. With NetworkManager 8 does not work.
> > Therefore, it is necessary either add support for NetworkManager 8 to
> > tdehw-lib or fix knetworkmanager8.
> >
> >
> Ah ah! I didn't know that, thanks. So knetworkmanager8 is still relevant to
> the trunk and will have to stay until support for NM0.8 is added to
> tdehw-lib. What about kpowersave? Is it still needed for some reasons?
> Cheers
>   Michele

Theoretically, there could be a need to use kpowersave. Because tdehw-lib is
based on the sysfs, it is bound to the Linux kernel. If anyone will be
interested in TDE on another Unix system, then will either have to use HAL or
implement tdehw-lib for another kernel.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@...
Read list messages on the web archive:
Please remember not to top-post: