-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA224

>
>> > Here you go.
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, when I see a webpage with no whitespace at the edges,
>> the
>> > first thing
>> > that pops into my head is, "The 1990s called--they want their
>> aesthetic
>> > back."  All it
>> > needs is a few old-style frames. ;P
>> >
>> > Also, the grey gradient you provided doesn't look good to me with the
>> > other graphics.
>> >
>> > (In other words, the version doesn't do much for me.)
>> >
>> > E. Liddell
>>
>> Yeah, the gray looks lousy.  Sorry Alaxandre. :-)
>>
>> I'm divided on the whitespace border issue.  A large part of me hates
>> wasting screen space like that, but we don't need to scream "obsolete"
>> either.
>>
>> Tim
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> To my personal preference, it's the best version of the website. I'd
> prefer it to stay with the lightsilver gradient, but if you really don't
> want, can you at least keep the dark blue gradient I provided.
>
> I looks much better without white border all around.
>
> I don't know what tells you that it's only obsolete websites that are
> expanding to the full browser size. Most big websites such as
> facebook.com,  outlook.com, gmail.com, webs.com are filling the screen.
> Seeing it as obsolete doesn't hold to me!
>
> Just my way of seeing it, but the screenshot provided has the version I
> prefer...
>
> Have a great day!
> -Alexandre

Just going on E. Liddell's opinion regarding the full screen.  If there
are no objections from others I prefer the full screen approach with no
border.

E. Liddell, could you please run off a screenshot of a version with a blue
gradient and no border for comments on the list?

Thanks!

Tim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iFYEARELAAYFAlRC8o4ACgkQLaxZSoRZrGFTfwDfQc5YbeuoDSwKJxgtxqH32AZh
aHpsqZ/l6pBXUgDdFRiJ18QPeWiTjrVL+eQ9i+QD5rHwQabT0Splbw==
=LhQM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----