-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA224

>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Visually, I have no problem with either using the provided false
>> shadow or the CSS3 one. What it does
>> >when it is displayed in Konq-error? Does it make Konq go crazy or it is
>> just not shown.
>>
>> Konqueror just ignores the style instruction, because it's limited to
>> CSS2.
>> So the screenshot appears with no shadow (and a little bit of extra
>> whitespace
>> below it).  In other words, it's harmless and downgrades gracefully.
>>
>> E. Liddell
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Well, it's okay for me to have the CSS3 shadow if it is harmless for
> Konqueror. These little adjustments improves a lot the website and I think
> that these changes are ready to go to production. What do you think?
>
> Thank you!
> -Alexandre
>

OK, let's go with the CSS3 shadow and get opinions from others on the list
regarding this design.  If the consensus is that the new site is better
then we'll put it into production.

Thanks!

Tim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iFYEARELAAYFAlREbyEACgkQLaxZSoRZrGHExADfU7AkANl57HoLomBmUQYU91eI
JH0EP44/zwijrwDeLRxMr2alBl84KpVFBZR+yvXWXh+S/9ymLjVzpA==
=SsV/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----