trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: December 2014

Re: [trinity-devel] R14.0.x branch

From: "Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf@...>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:28:52 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA224

> On 12/10/2014 09:47 AM, Slávek Banko wrote:
>>> Tags and branches created.  I did not create a branch for the
>>> >tde-packaging repository as I don't think it will be needed; if this
>>> >proves to be wrong in the future it can be easily corrected.
>>> >
>> Branch on tde-packaging was necessary in v3.5.13.x era and we can assume
>> that
>> it will be useful also for R14.0.x. However, it may be created when will
>> be
>> ready also packages for other distributions.
>>
>> I tested that I need to properly fix scripts/create_tarball, because due
>> to
>> the initial character in tag name fails sort of tags by version number.
>>
>
> IMO it is better to create a branch now rather than later.
> Work on v14.1.0 and v14.0.x will probably progress in different ways
> sooner or later. For example, if we do some package
> or file renaming, the packaging files will need to be different for the
> two branches.
> So better to keep things in order from the beginning and have a branch on
> the main repo and on the packaging repo going
> "side-by-side".
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> Cheers
>    Michele

OK, I think I see the point.  Branched. :-)

Tim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iFYEARELAAYFAlSHvfQACgkQLaxZSoRZrGGf+gDgx6mMT1mhCOgL0/CQ7qN9/5rg
1tTY9dCq0iiRygDgsk5akG9fwSgd9kfD4JL/S9DHwnkw4iQPtkUc5g==
=ZUGb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----