On Wednesday 10 of December 2014 05:00:20 Timothy Pearson wrote: > > On 2014/12/09 01:27 PM, Sl�vek Banko wrote: > >> On Tuesday 09 of December 2014 04:46:34 Michele Calgaro wrote: > >>> Tim, Slavek, > >>> over the weekend I did a full TDE rebuild in Jessie. > >>> The only two packages to fail were compiz-fusion-plugins-main-trinity > >>> and > >>> compiz-fusion-plugins-extra-trinity, due to a missing depencency for > >>> libjpeg62-dev. > >>> The attached 'control' files fix the problem for both of them. Just > >>> rename > >>> the files back to 'control'. > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> Michele > >> > >> I believe that it is better to use a general dependence libjpeg-dev. > >> What do you think? > > > > That's probably better. Both libjpeg62-dev and libjpeg62-turbo-dev > > provides libjpeg-dev. I didn't try building using only a dependency on > > libjpeg-dev, but if there is no FTBFS in any distro, I would go for it. > > > > Cheers > > Michele > > Slavek, do you want to handle this by building on your PPA and I'll copy > to the main archive once the builds are complete? > > For R14.0.1 I will look into moving some of these older -deps packages > into the main GIT repositories. > > Tim > For a moment, all updated packages will be ready to copy: https://quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/~slavek-banko/+archive/ubuntu/deps-r14/+copy-packages?field.name_filter=compiz-fusion-plugins&field.include_binaries=COPY_BINARIES&batch=50 Here I would saw the question, what packages are useful and what packages we really want to maintain. For example, for such Compiz I'd rather doubted if we want it. Some dependencies I consider to be temporary - such as lcms1, libept, libapt-front. Some dependencies are definite candidates for inclusion into the GIT - for example libr. -- Sl�vek