-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA224

> I personally disagree with this move, because your initial idea was to
> make R14 tde compatible and the rest was left for the KDE 3.15. Why moving
> back now?! What is the benefit of this?I really dislike changing things
> back and forth and on top after TDE stated that R14 will be TDE
> oriented.Could such things be discussed in the public please.
>
> regards

Some of this might be due to the fact that I've been largely unavailable
for the past several months (life / putting food on the table), therefore
I think my original goals of migrating everything from KDE to TDE have
stalled.

Michele, what is the actual benefit of maintaining compatibility with the
obsolete KDE 3.5 series instead of automatically upgrading the kdevelop
files to a TDE format?  There is no guarantee that KDE will continue to
use a compatible format in the future so I don't see how this is a good
idea?

Thanks!

Tim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iFYEARELAAYFAlWBqGQACgkQLaxZSoRZrGG4pQDfZ0DOjy8UEnSy5+ZnuH90okcn
8sLWDEvAqikIEQDgwsHmbpwKs7RsjwvFSMU3xfZWk4U+h6vrk4Cj3A==
=uL0u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----