On Wed July 8 2015 3:27:19 pm Slávek Banko wrote:
> Good question. Because we are in a phase freeze, so I would say that the 
> candidate to push should address a serious bug - for example, application 
> crash, FTBFS and similar problems. At the same time at the patch should not 
> be risky to have unexpected side effects. The patch should also gain support 
> of at least two developers with commit access.

In that case, in addition to bug 2454, perhaps the following could be added:

1610 Change KAlarm autostart delay from 30 to 3 seconds
2023 Remove an obsolete comment
2123 Fix incorrect directory permissions for /tmp/tdesocket-global
2255 Update kalarm calendar.ics
2283 Change [exitkde] group to [exittde]

Darrell