trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: March 2016

Re: [trinity-devel] TQString::fromUtf8 vs TQString::fromLatin1

From: Michele Calgaro <michele.calgaro@...>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:41:36 +0900
On 2016/03/23 04:35 PM, Fat-Zer wrote:
> 2016-03-23 9:20 GMT+03:00 Michele Calgaro <michele.calgaro@...>:
>> On 2016/03/23 02:51 PM, Fat-Zer wrote:
>> Uhm, makes sense, good point.
>> Interestingly my disagreement with you came from the other way around: what if the filesystem is using a 16bit or 32bit
>> encoding? How would TQString::fromLocal8Bit() interpret that?
>> Anyhow it was just my 2 cents :-)
>> Cheers
>>   Michele
> 
> Firstly, TQString::fromLocal8Bit() has const char * argument, but
> neither utf16 nor utf32 may be stored inside a plain char* array, so
> it's not an issue (unless we are on some very strange platform with a
> 16 or 18 bit chars)... For Utf16 there is fromUcs2(), but on system
> interaction level it's useful only for non-*nix'es...
> In the unix world all API calls use char* and as a consequence no
> native unix filesystem uses long-Char encoding. AFAIK the only one
> semi-supported filesystem in linux that uses utf16 is ntfs, and
> symbols are converted by the kernel (or ntfs-3g) to the desired
> encoding (see "nls" and "utf8" mount options for kernel module and
> "locale" for ntfs-3g).
> 
> PS: Sorry to everybody if we are making too much noise on the mail list...
> 
Thanks for the detailed explanation Alex, always good to learn some more bits of information,
since you are quite obviously more knowledgeable than me on this matter ;-)
Cheers
  Michele


Attachments: