trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: February 2020

Re: [trinity-devel] "register int" still needed?

From: "Michele Calgaro via trinity-devel" <trinity-devel@...>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 20:34:48 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 2020/02/14 04:00 PM, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> Anno domini 2020 Fri, 14 Feb 01:53:46 -0600 David C. Rankin scripsit:
>> On 2020/01/26 05:24 PM, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> Are the "register int" definitions in the TDE sources still needed? As far as I can tell the compiler just
>>> gives a warning and interprets "register int" as "int" - so would it bee a good idea to replace all "rgister
>>> int" with "int" ?
>>>
>>> Nik
>>>
>> I think with the current state of compiler optimization, "register int" is pretty much useless or even make
>> things worse . Cheers Michele
>>
>> They are useless, register is no longer needed.
>
> So can we remove them?
>
> Nik
>
>
Already removed from code a couple of weeks ago or so.
Cheers
  Michele
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=YFfK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----