> > From what I hear, cmake porting isn't too hard once you get used to > it. I will be helping with this once I get my new hard disk (which I > will be ordering on Thursday). > > As I understand it (someone correct me if I'm wrong), there is too > much risk of the autotools api changing again, which is what broke > building to begin with, so rather than having to worry about fixing > the headers with each new version of autotools, it'd be much easier to > just use cmake. I've also heard that a project that is correctly setup > for cmake can be easier to work with when doing the actual build than > when trying to build with autotools. > Not to mention the time required for building the following packages: kdelibs: with Automake: 50 minutes with CMake: 7 minutes kdebase: with Automake: 60 minutes with CMake: 10 minutes See a distinct advantage there? ;-) This would greatly help when fixing bugs or adding new features. Also, from what I can see, the core Trinity modules are almost ported to CMake. I am working through the Debian/Ubuntu build glitches now, and will have a better handle on the current status of things as my builds progress. Don't give up yet! Tim