On 3/17/11, calvin morrison <mutantturkey@...> wrote:
> On 17 March 2011 15:23, Darrell Anderson <humanreadable@...> wrote:
>> I think for the immediate future (2+ years or so?) that Trinity should not
>> get fancy with logos or cuteness.
>>
>> Tim has already modified the traditional KDE3 logos and substituted the K
>> with a T. That provides acknowledgment of roots distinguishes Trinity from
>> KDE3. Simple and straightforward.
>>
>> In two to three years, if Trinity is alive and well, then perhaps a new
>> logo should be considered.
>>
>> Darrell
>>
>>
>
> I think that brainstorming now cannot hurt. I also think that we do
> need to look into working on themes, logos, websites all that jazz.
> instead of being stuck with some crappy old logo, maybe it would be
> good to have a new one. People see fresh logo, (even if it the same
> concept of the T) and a new theme, as well as anything else on .13 or
> after, they will also assume we are making improvements elsewere.
>
> take windows for example, its been getting progressively worse since
> XP, yet each time no one notices because they keep making it move
> attractive.
>
> Just my thoughts
>
> Calvin Morrison
>

I completely agree, it couldn't hurt.

Kate