On 03/17/2011 09:59 PM, Katheryne Draven wrote: > On 3/17/11, calvin morrison<mutantturkey@...> wrote: >> On 17 March 2011 15:23, Darrell Anderson<humanreadable@...> wrote: >>> I think for the immediate future (2+ years or so?) that Trinity should not >>> get fancy with logos or cuteness. >>> >>> Tim has already modified the traditional KDE3 logos and substituted the K >>> with a T. That provides acknowledgment of roots distinguishes Trinity from >>> KDE3. Simple and straightforward. >>> >>> In two to three years, if Trinity is alive and well, then perhaps a new >>> logo should be considered. >>> >>> Darrell >>> >>> >> I think that brainstorming now cannot hurt. I also think that we do >> need to look into working on themes, logos, websites all that jazz. >> instead of being stuck with some crappy old logo, maybe it would be >> good to have a new one. People see fresh logo, (even if it the same >> concept of the T) and a new theme, as well as anything else on .13 or >> after, they will also assume we are making improvements elsewere. >> >> take windows for example, its been getting progressively worse since >> XP, yet each time no one notices because they keep making it move >> attractive. >> >> Just my thoughts >> >> Calvin Morrison >> > I completely agree, it couldn't hurt. > > Kate I don'tknow it _always_ hurts me to think ;)