trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: May 2011

Re: [trinity-devel] need more info about qt3 patches, for redone a tarball of tq3 3.3.8c

From: PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@...>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:18:01 -0430
¬_¬u


On 5/10/11, /dev/ammo42 <mickeytintincolle@...> wrote:
> Le Tue, 10 May 2011 15:11:51 -0430,
> PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@...> a écrit :
>
>> theres a refresh workaround  .. i consult htat reverification of
>> notifi Xrand , i applied that for comp backguard on minimal builds:
>>
>> This patch replaces the old #0032 patch as actually just a workaround.
>> Taken from debian builds:
>>
>> --- a/src/kernel/qapplication_x11.cpp
>> +++ b/src/kernel/qapplication_x11.cpp
>> @@ -3407,7 +3407,8 @@ int QApplication::x11ProcessEvent( XEven
>>  #endif
>>
>>  #ifndef QT_NO_XRANDR
>> -    if (event->type == xrandr_eventbase + RRScreenChangeNotify) {
>> +    if (event->type == xrandr_eventbase + RRScreenChangeNotify
>> +	|| ( event->type == ConfigureNotify &&
>> event->xconfigure.window == QPaintDevice::x11AppRootWindow())) {
>>  	// update Xlib internals with the latest screen configuration
>>  	XRRUpdateConfiguration(event)
> It's exactly the same patch.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/10/11, /dev/ammo42 <mickeytintincolle@...> wrote:
>> > Le Tue, 10 May 2011 14:31:00 -0430,
>> > PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@...> a écrit :
>> >
>> >> please help:
>> >>
>> >> About the 67101 and 101516 (these dublicated of fisrt) The old
>> >> qt-copy patch #0032 seems was wrong, and the real problem is in
>> >> the X server as can i see
>> >> ttps://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2965 .
>> > Effectively, it seems to be a kludge.
>> > From man Xrandr:
>> >>The  XRRScreenChangeNotify  event  is  sent  to  clients  that
>> >>ask to be informed whenever the root window configuration changes.
>> >>Configuration changes may include resolution, physical size,
>> >>subpixel order (see XRender(3)), and rotation.  Note that changes
>> >>to any or all of  these  could occur due to external events (user
>> >>control in the X server, a different monitor/flat panel display
>> >>being hot-plugged) and is not only the result of a protocol/library
>> >>request to the X server.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I should remove this patch, any body removed from ARCH or slak
>> >> builds?
>> > I just removed it. Anyway, like every other qt-copy patch, it has
>> > never been included in Slackware, and it didn't prevent Slackware's
>> > KDE3 from working well. Keeping it would not introduce bugs, but
>> > just perhaps slow the library (but I don't think it would slow it
>> > much).
>> >> <snip>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> > trinity-devel-unsubscribe@... For additional
>> > commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@...
>> > Read list messsages on the Web archive:
>> > http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
>> > Please remember not to top-post:
>> > http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> trinity-devel-help@...
> Read list messsages on the Web archive:
> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
> Please remember not to top-post:
> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
>
>


-- 
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
Cofundador de Venenux;  debian based multimedia alike free only zealots
users (oh well, i try but..too many free guidelines buahhh)
http://shutendouji.net
creador de massenkoh linux; debian enhanchements for better up to date
support on stable brand, including non-free soft.