On 05/16/2011 10:38 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
> If something seems unusual (e.g. that nastiness you posted above), please
> look through the tarball I posted to this thread earlier to see if there
> are any patches that may have caused the problem.  If so, just let me know
> and I will reverse the patch in question.
>
> Tim
>

Will do,  I haven't had a chance to revisit Qt3 in the past few days. Mickey? 
(/dev/ammo42) has done a good deal of looking at it. We will have to compare 
notes and get a good bullet-proof baseline Qt3 setup and see what patches can be 
added to the svn tree that will work with *all* distributions + gcc46 to 
minimize the distro specific/x86_64 specific patches and build scripts.

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.