Le Tue, 17 May 2011 21:23:42 -0500,
"David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@...> a �crit :

> On 05/16/2011 10:38 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
> > If something seems unusual (e.g. that nastiness you posted above),
> > please look through the tarball I posted to this thread earlier to
> > see if there are any patches that may have caused the problem.  If
> > so, just let me know and I will reverse the patch in question.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> 
> Will do,  I haven't had a chance to revisit Qt3 in the past few days.
> Mickey? (/dev/ammo42) has done a good deal of looking at it. We will
> have to compare notes and get a good bullet-proof baseline Qt3 setup
> and see what patches can be added to the svn tree that will work with
> *all* distributions + gcc46 to minimize the distro specific/x86_64
> specific patches and build scripts.
I did not review the largest patches (one of the Debian ones has a size
of 1 MB; for such a size I just count on its Debian/Ubuntu test of
time :)).