trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: May 2011

Re: [trinity-devel] Where Have the Styles Gone?? (No Keramic, No Plastic, etc..) Missing in current builds.

From: Baho Utot <baho-utot@...>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:23:41 -0400
On 05/19/2011 05:57 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 05/18/2011 09:52 PM, Tiago Marques wrote:
>>     Prior to building last time, I removed the following export:
>>
>>     #   export
>>     
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/trinity/lib:/opt/trinity/lib/kde3:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>>
>>     I wonder if that is killing Trinity's ability to find the styles? 
>> I'll try a
>>     rebuild...
>>
>>
>> Let me know how that goes. Also have a look in "~/.xsession-errors", 
>> maybe
>> there's something useful there.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Tiago
>
> DAMN!
>
>   That was it! I have the styles back after the rebuild of kdelibs 
> with the export of LD_LIBRARY_PATH! The Trinity CMake files are not 
> doing whatever gets done with:
>
>   export 
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/trinity/lib:/opt/trinity/lib/kde3:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
> unless you explicitly export it. Shouldn't the CMake files handle this??

I have changed the prefix that I compile my packages to /usr/local just 
to advoid this problem.  After trinity changes the package name and 
libraries from kde to something else, all I then need to do is change 
/usr/local to /usr and the packages intergrate perfectly into the arch 
system.  /usr/local on an arch system has nothing installed there so I 
have the perfect playground.


>
> Next issue: Why are things still going in ${prefix}/lib/kde3 ?? 
> Shouldn't we make something like ${prefix}/lib/tde now to avoid 
> potential conflict? (or would the code rewrite be horrendous?)
>