> On Monday 20 June 2011 01:13:49 Timothy Pearson wrote: > >> > If KOffice is removed then there is no reason why other apps should be >> > added to Trinity. KDE:KDE3 repository >> > currently has more than 420 KDE3 packages but adding them to Trinity >> would >> > have no reason >> > if KOffice is removed (as KOffice has better quality and better >> integrated >> > than most of them). >> >> In certain areas. In others (kword and such) the quality is inferior. > > I think there is no other general-purpose word processor for KDE3 other > than KWord. > It is unique in its class. I have Scribus, Lyx, TexMaker, PDF Editor in > KDE:KDE3 > but they all implement different functionality and less closely integrated > with KDE. This is completely subjective. I would argue that OpenOffice.org is unmatched for the way it blends in to TDE and reads/writes all the major document formats nearly flawlessly. > >> > Even more, if KOfiice is removed then there is no reason why other >> Trinity >> > components should >> > not be removed as well by the same logic (AmaroK, Kaffeine, even >> > Konqueror). >> >> No. Some of the koffice components have direct and better replacements, >> such as kword. > > This is completely subjective. One can argue that Amarok 1.4 has > better replacements Amarok 2 and Clementine. It can be argued that > Konqueror can be replaced with Rekonq and Dolphin etc. No, because in those cases the feature set did not include features that were present in the original applications. > > It is also quite arguable whether say OOo Calc is better than KSpread: > opening > a spreadsheet in Calc can take minutes while in KSpread only one or > two seconds. > >> > Concerning Open/Libre Office as you know it has only basic KDE3 >> > integration which can >> > be removed any moment. Libre Office team for example is currently >> > discussing radical change >> > of the user interface which may lead to removal of Qt3 styles support. >> >> LibreOffice is more than happy to accept TDE integration support. > > Re-implementing Qt3 support after the change may require huge effort while > LibreOffice team is not commited to do it themselves. Do you feel capable > to > re-implement interface integration yourselves even if your patches will be > happily accepted? Actually, yes! I have done it before with other apps and to be honest it is not difficult at all. Tim