> On Monday 20 June 2011 01:52:47 Timothy Pearson wrote:
>
>> > And, btw, it honestly thought that you already completed Tqt porting
>> of
>> > core KDE parts.
>>
>> koffice is not core!
>
> This depends on the perspective. KDE:KDE3 has much more applications
> written for KDE3
>  and from this point of view all KDE3 components tat are part of the
> official distribution look as core.

"Much more applications".  Curious then that the (large) Trinity userbase
has not run into issues due to missing applications in Trinity itself.

I submit that KDE:KDE3 is likely chock full of practically useless,
stagnant applications that very few people even knew existed back when
KDE3 was in use.

What are you doing to keep KDE3 up to date?  What will you do when Qt3
finally is completely useless/uncompilable on modern desktops?  How are
you improving KDE3 by adding new features?  From what I can tell the
KDE:KDE3 maintainers are content to maintain a codebase that is not only
cluttered, but is slowly growing stale and irrelevant, just so that they
can claim to have "more appliations", which in and of itself is of dubious
value.

Not to be rude, but I have not seen much factual information from you,
just a lot of unsubstantiated and/or dubious claims.  Please correct me if
I am wrong.

Timothy Pearson
Trinity Desktop Project