On 7/7/11, Timothy Pearson <kb9vqf@...> wrote: >> the mail cited by tim, >> > > While we are on that topic I should mention that I consider many of the > original "suggestions" in the message I forwarded to be nits, if not just > plain ridiculous. I forwarded the message to this list to make sure that > I was not alone, and to see what people's thoughts on the matter were. > > To clear up some things: > * koffice cannot be built in pieces, but there is no reason to drop it at > this time. It will stay in the TDE distribution tarball for the > forseeable future, and *may* even pick up some enhancements along the way > if ioslaves from Calligra can be backported to TQt easily enough. > * The extent of the renaming for the 3.5.13 release would be core > libraries and non-user-visible strings. This would be done only to make > downstream packaging easier (i.e. rename libkdecore.so to libtdecore.so, > etc.). User visible strings / application names will probably never > change, except the KDE->TDE string replacement that has already occurred. > > Tim > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you! I was so confused as to what this was all about. No offense to anyone. I really do understand about language barriers. I speak 4 languages and since a head injure 15 years ago took down the barriers keeping these languages in check. I have to work hard to keep from starting a sentence in English and ending it in Gaelic. However, none of the affects my ability to understand language so all of this confused me. I didn't know what was being disagreed about. I agree, it would be illogical to remove koffice or rename familiar apps. Kate