>> > I probably should try building koffice without the wv >> package installed >> > since that package is not part of the stock >> Slackware. >> > >> >> I don't know if kdepim will build without wvware as it is >> used to import >> MS documents, but please let me know either way. > > > Did you mean koffice rather than kdepim? Yes I did, sorry. > > I'm a tad confused, but I was getting sleepy when I quit last night. Same here apparently. > > Short story: the wv package is not a part of the stock Slackware and was > not installed in my chroot environment. So what caused the build failure? > Today I realized there is a wv2 package installed by the stock Slackware. > The wv and wv2 packages are not the same. Looking at the include > declarations in texthandler.cpp shows wv2 and not wv. Therefore the wv2 > package was the problem. > > Now I'm less confused. > > The wv2 version provided by Slackware 12.2 and 13.0 is 0.2.3. The version > provided in Slackware 13.1 and Current is 0.4.2. > > I'll run a koffice build with the newer version of wv2. If koffice builds > without failing with that same error then 0.4.2 will become another > dependency. > > Yet that raises a question. What changed from 3.5.10/1.6.3 that created > this error? The wv2 API did. The changes were extensive enough that it would have been quite ugly/borderline unmaintainable to keep compatibility with the old API. Also a factor in this decision is that the older version of wv2 has far more problems reading M$ documents (its primary function) than the new one, so there is really no reason to stick with the older version. Tim