On Wednesday 17 August 2011 06:41:53 Timothy Pearson wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 August 2011 06:07:16 Timothy Pearson wrote: > > > >> And you will guarantee that the upstream LibreOffice project continues > >> to > >> build an unmaintained plugin just for us? > > > > Once it is not included then fork it. There is no problem right now. > > > > I think it would be better to get a new plugin into LibreOffice before the > KDE3 one is dropped, as this will avoid the whole unpleasantness that goes > along with trying to re-add a dropped component (and many times prevents > the new component from being included in the upstream project). It would > also minimize the impact to users, who theoretically could end up without > Trinity integration for at least one LibreOffice release cycle. You mean you want to write a new plugin? :-\ Does it mean you also want to rewrite the styles support, address book support etc?