On Wednesday 17 August 2011 06:41:53 Timothy Pearson wrote:

> > On Wednesday 17 August 2011 06:07:16 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> >
> >> And you will guarantee that the upstream LibreOffice project continues
> >> to
> >> build an unmaintained plugin just for us?
> >
> > Once it is not included then fork it. There is no problem right now.
> >
> 
> I think it would be better to get a new plugin into LibreOffice before the
> KDE3 one is dropped, as this will avoid the whole unpleasantness that goes
> along with trying to re-add a dropped component (and many times prevents
> the new component from being included in the upstream project).  It would
> also minimize the impact to users, who theoretically could end up without
> Trinity integration for at least one LibreOffice release cycle.

You mean you want to write a new plugin? :-\

Does it mean you also want to rewrite the styles support, address book support etc?