> On Wednesday 17 August 2011 06:41:53 Timothy Pearson wrote:
>
>> > On Wednesday 17 August 2011 06:07:16 Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> >
>> >> And you will guarantee that the upstream LibreOffice project
>> continues
>> >> to
>> >> build an unmaintained plugin just for us?
>> >
>> > Once it is not included then fork it. There is no problem right now.
>> >
>>
>> I think it would be better to get a new plugin into LibreOffice before
>> the
>> KDE3 one is dropped, as this will avoid the whole unpleasantness that
>> goes
>> along with trying to re-add a dropped component (and many times prevents
>> the new component from being included in the upstream project).  It
>> would
>> also minimize the impact to users, who theoretically could end up
>> without
>> Trinity integration for at least one LibreOffice release cycle.
>
> You mean you want to write a new plugin? :-\

NO!!

> Does it mean you also want to rewrite the styles support, address book
> support etc?

No, not at all.  See my second Email that crossed yours to the list :-)

Tim