> In article
> <1320256534.11880.YahooMailClassic@...>,
> Darrell Anderson  <trinity-devel@...> wrote:
>>The Trinity Paper Cut project never got officially launched after
>>3.5.12. I would like to see that project receive official attention.
>>Many bugs were quashed for 3.5.13, but I can't test any bug reports I
>>filed until I build and install packages. I have received only a few
>>notices that any of the bug reports I filed received attention.
>
> Though I only dabble on the development side I'd like to support this
> view.  3.5.13 is a superb piece of work with many improvements, and I
> am running it on my main stable machine which says something about my
> trust for it.  Congratulations to everyone involved !
>
> But a few regressions have crept into 3.5.13, particularly my Javascript
> one which is turning out to prevent quite a number of AJAX based sites
> from working, and one or two others that also seem to be related to cmake
> not picking up libraries (haven't bugged them yet as I have been busy
> this week).  I think these may disappoint people who come to Trinity as
> the JS one at least is quite visible.
>
> I'm certainly willing to help on a 3.5.13.1 "papercut" release and feed
> the fixes forwards to the main branch, to leave the main devs free to
> tackle features in 3.5.14.
>
> Nick
> --

I would not be opposed to a single SRU for the 3.5.13 kdebase module, as
that is where most of the regressions seem to be centered.  I have started
an Etherpad to keep track of proposed changes in the SRU here:
http://trinity.etherpad.trinitydesktop.org/16

If you don't have an Etherpad account just request one.

Tim