trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: November 2011

Re: [trinity-devel] Appeal for freedom of speech

From: Ilya Chernykh <anixxsus@...>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:41:33 +0400
On Sunday 13 November 2011 00:29:39 Timothy Pearson wrote:


> The only submitted patch 

This is not true. I contributed these patches:
http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1317502993:5402bbfde73f33c76f17a72bcd6ea3d730681fb9.diff
http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1315109543:90c6afc471fdb1a7761a1fab5094a25299018ec1.diff
http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1304806557:e789477ef1d0a99f7795890210b4fb68f45fffdc.diff
http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1299984139:790391e3a90a709160301953e47bd8f2fdc39c07.diff
http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1298313909:f0023a8307d74fa725424821433582eea645a4c5.diff
http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1297797316:cc0ad49c75d6cf6b4e63eb8c6012afe55c1589f9.diff

and a fix to this bug:
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=139

> (http://patchwork.trinitydesktop.org/project/trinity/list/) removed a
> large chunk of HAL-dependent functionality and was therefore not included.

As can be seen from the patch, it does not remove any functionality, just the opposite, it enables and repairs
a large part of code previously commented out and repairs other minor issues.

> I mean no disrespect to Ilya's character and never have.  This does not
> change the fact that many have perceived his behavior on this list as
> rude, which I think has led to things escalating further than they should
> have.  We are both attempting to further the same goal, albeit in vastly
> different and apparently incompatible ways.