> On Sunday 13 November 2011 00:41:33 you wrote:
>
>> > The only submitted patch
>>
>> This is not true. I contributed these patches:
>> http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1317502993:5402bbfde73f33c76f17a72bcd6ea3d730681fb9.diff
>> http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1315109543:90c6afc471fdb1a7761a1fab5094a25299018ec1.diff
>> http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1304806557:e789477ef1d0a99f7795890210b4fb68f45fffdc.diff
>> http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1299984139:790391e3a90a709160301953e47bd8f2fdc39c07.diff
>> http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1298313909:f0023a8307d74fa725424821433582eea645a4c5.diff
>> http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1297797316:cc0ad49c75d6cf6b4e63eb8c6012afe55c1589f9.diff
>>
>> and a fix to this bug:
>> http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=139
>
> Well and also this one:
>
> http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1299175239:2a98648e2c89cbb1265f842903c6370e71f544ae.diff
>

The common theme is that they are relatively trivial, and especially that
last one no claim of ownership can really be attached, as the latest
versions of GCC will demand that exact fix.

Tim