> On Sunday 13 November 2011 03:08:26 Keith Daniels wrote:
>
>> If Trinity is as bad as you claim (and not just in spite just because
>> your pet project seems to be being neglected lately) why did
>> DistroWatch give Trinity Desktop money?
>
> This may explain why Pearson is so paranoid.

I did not even want to grace this comment with a reply, but you are
insinuating such a high level of unprofessional conduct that I must defend
myself in some fashion.

You are completely incorrect.  Perhaps you think this is how FOSS projects
should be run, I really have no idea.  Just be aware that the TDE project
has been operating at a *net loss* ever since its inception.  It exists
purely because I (and many others) believe the KDE3 codebase should not
have been thrown aside so carelessly many years ago, and I continue to
believe that its interface has relevance today.  Any other motives are
baseless speculation on your part, and your insinuations amount to a
personal attack on my integrity.

You do yourself more harm than I.

Timothy Pearson
Trinity Desktop Porject