On Sunday 13 November 2011 04:47:39 you wrote:
> On Sunday 13 November 2011 00:57:10 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> 
> > >> and a fix to this bug:
> > >> http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=139
> > >
> > > Well and also this one:
> > >
> > > http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/1299175239:2a98648e2c89cbb1265f842903c6370e71f544ae.diff
> > >
> > 
> > The common theme is that they are relatively trivial, and especially that
> > last one no claim of ownership can really be attached, as the latest
> > versions of GCC will demand that exact fix.
> 
> The last link is not correct. I was referring to this patch:
> 
> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::2088
> 

Again incorrect link.

I was actually referring to this patch:

http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::2560

Possibly Pearson did not include it.