Ilya Chernykh wrote: > On Sunday 13 November 2011 15:46:09 Julius Schwartzenberg wrote: > >>>>> It is pity that such project as KDE3 was cloned by an unstable paranoid psycho. >>>>> >>>> Until now i was a bystander and I didn't want to participate in this >>>> discussion but now I'm getting feeling it's not anymore about which is >>>> better/upstream/updated >>> >>> It was never about which is better/upstream/updated. >> >> It seems originally there were mainly miscommunications between you and >> Robert. He already apologized for this. Timothy is also sensitive to >> criticism and the discussion continued. > > Pearson has ill memory it seems. He quickly forgot all I did for Trinity to the extent to claim > I contributed nothing. > > I think I did more than just be considered "a source of headache". This strange > property of Timothy's memory is impressing. Not long ago he assigned to me a bugreport > to make knetworkmanager compatible with new API (after accepting a first patch from > openSUSE's KDE:KDE3). The last discussion in that bugreport > > http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=521 I agree here that Timothy's comment calling KDE:KDE3 obsolete is inappropriate. It seems he felt your response was harsh, but this does not make it appropriate for him to respond in such a way. I would have only expected a response asking for a diff. I understand it seemed inappropriate to you to be assigned to a bug in Trinity's bugzilla?