On Sunday 13 November 2011 20:19:58 Calvin Morrison wrote: > You were assigned this bug because (Tim?) thought you were going to fix the > API in your KDE:KDE3 repository, so we were hoping to incorporate patches > from your tree. You then marked "CLOSED/WON'TFIX" and wrote "I am not a > Trinity developer. I will not fix it in Trinity." > > That said, can we leave this be? I do not understand why you persist! FOSS > is all voluntary. If you don't like Timothy or his method, you're free to > leave. If you want to help the project you need to 'play by the rules' so > to speak. If you want to tear down the project and condemn us to the fiery > depths of Hell, so be it. But then please do not do so on our mailing > lists. I was banned then I closed the bugreport or you expect people to contribute even under ban? Even more, Pearson banned me from all other Trinity mailing lists besides -devel long time ago and still he has courage to assign me bugs and expect my help. Not to say that he has claimed in his post that I contributed nothing to Trinity despite he himself accepter numerous my patches, including in knetwoirkmanager which made it build with NM 0.9. Your Trinity just parasitize on other projects and at the same time Pearson does not express gratitude but just mocks us in shit. I cannot remember a single patch of Trinity that is undoubtfully useful except those patches which were accepted to Trinity from Chakra.