Message: previous - next
Month: November 2011

Re: [trinity-devel] trinity version

From: Werner Joss <werner@...>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:45:24 +0100
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 20:31:55 Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
> Right now I think the "three" part is nicely covered within the name
> already, so I don't think there is a need to resemble that anywhere else.

godd point, indeed :)