Message: previous - next
Month: November 2011

Re: [trinity-devel] Hello list!

From: Robert Xu <robxu9@...>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:28:19 -0500
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 19:25, Andrea Cascio <andrea@...> wrote:
> On Saturday 19 November 2011 01:01:00 Robert Xu wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 18:56, Andrea Cascio <andrea@...> wrote:
>> > Many thanks for the help Robert!
>> > Ok, now I finally have a coherent set of patches. Many of them are just
>> > for specific builds, but it seems to me that some should be included in
>> > the main tree. Anyway, I don't know the codebase enough. :)
> [...]
>> It's the weekend, so I should be able to continue working on packaging.
>> Until Sunday. >_> Then it's all hell breaks loose until Wednesday night...
>> sigh.
> Thanks god it's weekend here too :D , so finally we have some updated qt3
> packages for openSUSE :)
> I have commited to the OBS, and it's completing the build, I still don't know
> how to force the build of "extensions" and "devel-doc" but at least the core
> packages are ready for testing.

I can do that.

> If you approve, can you commit to GIT?


> Now, I have some question for people on the list:
> If I understand correctly, qt3-3.3.8d is GPL only, isn't it? Should I edit the
> specfile removing references to QPL and the lines about "buying licenses from
> Trolltech"?

That's a good idea, go ahead.

> I had a problem with qt3-extensions: the specfile builds a qt3-unixODBC
> subpackage, and of course requires unixODBC-devel. Ok, but 3.3.8d (unlike
> 3.3.8b/c!) links libiodbc, that come from iODBC, which in turn "conflicts"
> unixODBC.
> 2 solutions here:
> - drop qt3-unixODBC and build a qt3-iodbc.
> - revert the change that included iodbc in the dependencies.
> I've chosen the second, because seems a bit more conservative. The new patch,
> for opensuse builds, is revert-iodbc-to-uodbc.diff, I hope it does not broke
> something else in the SQL part.

I trust you :)

> A final note:
> src/kernel/qtkdeintegration_x11.cpp
> src/kernel/qtkdeintegration_x11_p.h
> Is name correct? Not qttdeintegration_x11.cpp?

That's still correct for now.

> So, what now Robert? :)
> tdelibs? Seems though...

Yup, I'll push arts and tqtinterface (libtqt4) right away so that we
can start on tdelibs.

later daze. :: Robert Xu :: ::