> I had been thinking about the Trinity/KWin relationship for quite some time
> and todays triaging showed me that this just does not make sense. I do
> understand that you want to provide a KDE 3.5 desktop experience. This is
> great and I am all for it. But KWin 4 is a clear continuation of KWin 3. It is
> not a rewrite like other parts of the desktop. It is the same application,
> with more features, less bugs and in general a better performance.

Hi Martin,

What you're proposing makes sense, on the face of it.  And I ask these
question not as a troll or flame - and not from the perspective of really
knowing what the KWin component is responsible for:

Is the binary size and performance (desktop latency) going to be
comparable?

Does it drag in other KDE 4 dependencies?

- Nigel