> I had been thinking about the Trinity/KWin relationship for quite some time > and todays triaging showed me that this just does not make sense. I do > understand that you want to provide a KDE 3.5 desktop experience. This is > great and I am all for it. But KWin 4 is a clear continuation of KWin 3. It is > not a rewrite like other parts of the desktop. It is the same application, > with more features, less bugs and in general a better performance. Hi Martin, What you're proposing makes sense, on the face of it. And I ask these question not as a troll or flame - and not from the perspective of really knowing what the KWin component is responsible for: Is the binary size and performance (desktop latency) going to be comparable? Does it drag in other KDE 4 dependencies? - Nigel