2011/12/16 Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey@...>: > > > On 15 December 2011 19:29, L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou@...> wrote: >> >> 2011/12/16 Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey@...>: >> > >> > >> > On 15 December 2011 18:01, L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou@...> wrote: >> >> >> >> 2011/12/15 Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey@...>: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On 15 December 2011 07:14, L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou@...> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> 2011/12/15 Nicolas Bercher <nbercher@...>: >> >> >> > L0ner sh4dou a écrit : >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> You got me thinking about whole triselon thing. I did a two litte >> >> >> >> sketches for trinity logo proposal. >> >> >> >> First: http://db.tt/LwqZWTuP >> >> >> >> Second: http://db.tt/YpivoAGk >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Maybe the "T" is not that much important and the logo could be >> >> >> > designed >> >> >> > without it. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Nicolas >> >> >> > >> >> >> If we remove the t from the second one we will just get logo of >> >> >> Trisquel linux. For the first one it's integral part of logo, >> >> >> without >> >> >> it the space looks 'empty' to me. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> >> >> trinity-devel-unsubscribe@... >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> >> >> trinity-devel-help@... >> >> >> Read list messsages on the Web archive: >> >> >> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ >> >> >> Please remember not to top-post: >> >> >> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > I like the first one more than the second (reminds me of the >> >> > trisequal >> >> > logo >> >> > to much, could be taken as far as a blatant rip off :x) >> >> Same opinion here. >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Does no one like the current trinity logo? I sort of like it actually >> >> > :) >> >> > But >> >> > if I had to pick it would be the first one. >> >> > >> >> > I like the idea of the Gear. it reminds me of a hard working, well >> >> > tuned >> >> > machine designed for serious activities, rather than a less serious >> >> > one. >> >> Yes, but this gear is too strong reference to KDE, anyway we can have >> >> a gear-like tooths in the logo (like in second example). >> >> > >> >> > Could you create this as an SVG? I could give it a whack. >> >> > >> >> Only If I learn how to xD >> >> Anyway I'm more occupied by PKGBUILDs for arch ATM, so I will work on >> >> this after I finish those. This was to gather some ideas, since I want >> >> to create new webpage for trinity at some point (acutally second thing >> >> on my TO-DO list, after PKGBUILDs) >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> >> trinity-devel-unsubscribe@... >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> >> trinity-devel-help@... >> >> Read list messsages on the Web archive: >> >> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ >> >> Please remember not to top-post: >> >> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting >> >> >> > >> > Aside from archlinux packages I'm also the defacto website designer, >> > well >> > sort of. >> > >> > I developed the current website ( a vast improvement from the previous >> > one ) >> > and it's been quite careful. >> > >> > We don't want anything to much, or to little, to complicated or to >> > simple. >> > I think improvments would be more warranted the this scenario. >> > >> I was thinking on relaying completely on the wiki system we use for >> whole site. It can be done. >> And I think we should add some sort of news system in which we will >> write what actually happens inside the project, so it don't seem dead. >> If we add ability to comment those news it will be like saying to >> users "we care about what you think!". User-frendliness. This can be >> done by using plugin for the wiki system. >> Generally the archlinux site is a great inspiration for me. It's >> simple, looks good and has everything you need. >> > > Indeed it looks great and works well, though I think it is very complicated > (it is hosted in their git repository so you can see) > > I'd like to see some things. > > A "planet" - basically it's a feed for all of our different blogs into one > page. > > A "apps" section, I think Darrell spoke about this before. > > In fact, Darrell had a lot of good stuff and ideas for simplifying the > navigation of the website, they're somewhere in the mail logs recently. > > I think we are avoiding using any sort of databsases however and we want to > make sure tihs all will render well on any web browser. > > Calvin Morrison Well I can do some css magic. It will look good and render on modern browsers (forget about konqueror tho). Not using databases is a big problem, since it practically constrains you to use static pages. As I said we could use the wiki system for everything. I'll try to make a draft after I finish pkgbuilds.