2011/12/16 L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou@...>: > 2011/12/16 Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey@...>: >> >> >> On 15 December 2011 19:29, L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou@...> wrote: >>> >>> 2011/12/16 Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey@...>: >>> > >>> > >>> > On 15 December 2011 18:01, L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou@...> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> 2011/12/15 Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey@...>: >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On 15 December 2011 07:14, L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou@...> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> 2011/12/15 Nicolas Bercher <nbercher@...>: >>> >> >> > L0ner sh4dou a écrit : >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> You got me thinking about whole triselon thing. I did a two litte >>> >> >> >> sketches for trinity logo proposal. >>> >> >> >> First: http://db.tt/LwqZWTuP >>> >> >> >> Second: http://db.tt/YpivoAGk >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Maybe the "T" is not that much important and the logo could be >>> >> >> > designed >>> >> >> > without it. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Nicolas >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> If we remove the t from the second one we will just get logo of >>> >> >> Trisquel linux. For the first one it's integral part of logo, >>> >> >> without >>> >> >> it the space looks 'empty' to me. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> >> >> trinity-devel-unsubscribe@... >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> >> >> trinity-devel-help@... >>> >> >> Read list messsages on the Web archive: >>> >> >> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ >>> >> >> Please remember not to top-post: >>> >> >> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > I like the first one more than the second (reminds me of the >>> >> > trisequal >>> >> > logo >>> >> > to much, could be taken as far as a blatant rip off :x) >>> >> Same opinion here. >>> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > Does no one like the current trinity logo? I sort of like it actually >>> >> > :) >>> >> > But >>> >> > if I had to pick it would be the first one. >>> >> > >>> >> > I like the idea of the Gear. it reminds me of a hard working, well >>> >> > tuned >>> >> > machine designed for serious activities, rather than a less serious >>> >> > one. >>> >> Yes, but this gear is too strong reference to KDE, anyway we can have >>> >> a gear-like tooths in the logo (like in second example). >>> >> > >>> >> > Could you create this as an SVG? I could give it a whack. >>> >> > >>> >> Only If I learn how to xD >>> >> Anyway I'm more occupied by PKGBUILDs for arch ATM, so I will work on >>> >> this after I finish those. This was to gather some ideas, since I want >>> >> to create new webpage for trinity at some point (acutally second thing >>> >> on my TO-DO list, after PKGBUILDs) >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> >> trinity-devel-unsubscribe@... >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> >> trinity-devel-help@... >>> >> Read list messsages on the Web archive: >>> >> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ >>> >> Please remember not to top-post: >>> >> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting >>> >> >>> > >>> > Aside from archlinux packages I'm also the defacto website designer, >>> > well >>> > sort of. >>> > >>> > I developed the current website ( a vast improvement from the previous >>> > one ) >>> > and it's been quite careful. >>> > >>> > We don't want anything to much, or to little, to complicated or to >>> > simple. >>> > I think improvments would be more warranted the this scenario. >>> > >>> I was thinking on relaying completely on the wiki system we use for >>> whole site. It can be done. >>> And I think we should add some sort of news system in which we will >>> write what actually happens inside the project, so it don't seem dead. >>> If we add ability to comment those news it will be like saying to >>> users "we care about what you think!". User-frendliness. This can be >>> done by using plugin for the wiki system. >>> Generally the archlinux site is a great inspiration for me. It's >>> simple, looks good and has everything you need. >>> >> >> Indeed it looks great and works well, though I think it is very complicated >> (it is hosted in their git repository so you can see) >> >> I'd like to see some things. >> >> A "planet" - basically it's a feed for all of our different blogs into one >> page. >> >> A "apps" section, I think Darrell spoke about this before. >> >> In fact, Darrell had a lot of good stuff and ideas for simplifying the >> navigation of the website, they're somewhere in the mail logs recently. >> >> I think we are avoiding using any sort of databsases however and we want to >> make sure tihs all will render well on any web browser. >> >> Calvin Morrison > > Well I can do some css magic. It will look good and render on modern > browsers (forget about konqueror tho). > Not using databases is a big problem, since it practically constrains > you to use static pages. As I said we could use the wiki system for > everything. I'll try to make a draft after I finish pkgbuilds. As for css magic, I did my tumblr page myself (http://bitdata.tumblr.com/), which is pretty simple and old css (apart for the fonts).