2011/12/16 Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey@...>:
>
>
> On 16 December 2011 07:16, Aleksey Midenkov <midenok@...> wrote:
>>
>> I might be a very ignorant in this topic. But I don't see a
>> justification for the rebranding. The product is *still* KDE on 99.9%
>> with a few bugs fixed. If there will be some large but hidden changes
>> like moving from HAL to UDEV, moving from DCOP to DBUS, XDG
>> compliance, etc. It will be *still* KDE user experience.
>
>
> Similar code, but it is nNo longer a KDE product
>>
>> The UI is
>> developed by KDE and the UI is that is valued most here. So this fuss
>> about replacement of K with T bothers me much! And this seem to take
>> too much energy instead of fixing real bugs.
>
>
> The UI was developed by KDE, no longer is. therefore we cannot continue
> using their name or conventions. We need to respect the KDE e.v and their
> wishes as well.
>
>> And by the way pronounciation of TDE sounds awkward... So I'm all
>> against it. Though I am just a user.
>
>
> and  Guh-Nome and Kay-Dee_Eeh sound better? I think the best solution is to
> just call it Trinity Desktop :)
>
+10