2011/12/16 Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey@...>: > > > On 16 December 2011 07:16, Aleksey Midenkov <midenok@...> wrote: >> >> I might be a very ignorant in this topic. But I don't see a >> justification for the rebranding. The product is *still* KDE on 99.9% >> with a few bugs fixed. If there will be some large but hidden changes >> like moving from HAL to UDEV, moving from DCOP to DBUS, XDG >> compliance, etc. It will be *still* KDE user experience. > > > Similar code, but it is nNo longer a KDE product >> >> The UI is >> developed by KDE and the UI is that is valued most here. So this fuss >> about replacement of K with T bothers me much! And this seem to take >> too much energy instead of fixing real bugs. > > > The UI was developed by KDE, no longer is. therefore we cannot continue > using their name or conventions. We need to respect the KDE e.v and their > wishes as well. > >> And by the way pronounciation of TDE sounds awkward... So I'm all >> against it. Though I am just a user. > > > and Guh-Nome and Kay-Dee_Eeh sound better? I think the best solution is to > just call it Trinity Desktop :) > +10