>> > For you folks more experienced with coding TDE and
>> Qt3, are there any
>> > clever ways to eliminate the overhead with the non X
>> commands? Seems
>> > that would be more efficient and shave a few
>> micro/millisecond
>> > response times here and there, especially for older
>> hardware. :)
>>
>> I doubt it.  Porting from Qt3 to Qt4 is non-trivial,
>> but the amount of work depends on the program.  There's
>> no way to eliminate X as long as Qt3 is used.
>
> I was not implying any porting to Qt4. :) Is there a decent technical
> reason why the X overhead can't be eliminated from the non X TDE commands?
>
> Darrell
>

In theory it might be possible to modify the Qt3 source and add an X-less
application constructor.  I have no idea how complex that would be.

Tim