On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:49:01 -0800 (PST)
Darrell Anderson <humanreadable@...> wrote:

> > It would not be a giant benefit to users who
> > already have loaded the libraries into memory, but it would
> > for people who are looking to use Trinity applications as
> > stand alone.
> 
> Okay, computer science majors. Quit trying to see who can crow the
> loudest. :)
> 
> All I want to know is whether the non gui commands of TDE such as
> kwriteconfig and kreadconfig can (easily) be built without the X
> overhead.
You would either have to:
-separate non-X-dependent parts of Qt like for Qt4
-not do that separation but instead use the X functions as weak symbols
and add a dlopen() of X libraries to every X-using Qt3 application

I really don't see a really easy option; there is a third option which
would be to compile both with-X and without-X versions of kdelibs and
Qt3 but without significant linker magic it is likely to load both
versions of kdelibs and Qt3 within a Trinity session.
> 
> Darrell
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> trinity-devel-unsubscribe@... For additional
> commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@... Read
> list messsages on the Web archive:
> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to
> top-post:
> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
>