On Sunday 08 January 2012 00:11:15 Darrell Anderson wrote:
[...]

> > This tells the user exactly what is being built.  If
> > the user wants something else, he has a basis to determine
> > what is missing (or extra) and make the appropriate
> > changes.
>
> Yes, this sounds palatable. As upstream providers we need to test
> everything. Right now doing that is cumbersome.
> I understand that individual packagers don't want everything enabled. I
> don't either, but I am looking at this as an upstream provider and not just
> a packager. We can't test everything if most of the features are disabled
> by default.

Actually I do not understand the problem. If you want to check all features, 
enable they.

-- 
Serghei