On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:37:49 +0000
Tiago Marques <tiagomnm@...> wrote:

> I didn't scale it, no. That's a bigger issue though, as you can see from
> Crystal SVG some cards have different versions for smaller icons, to
> improve the icon's clarity. Sometimes it's warranted, sometimes it's not.

Regardless, this is something to worry about after a final selection is made.

>> Based on your reaction, I suspect that what I presented actually looks
>> too finished.  That's my fault, though--really, I know better.
> 
> I mean that I thought these were final designs?

It's something they warn you against in design school: presenting something
that looks too finished at an early stage can convince the client that all aspects
of the design are already set in stone.  In this case, everything I posted was
a first draft--just a very polished-looking one--and I'm quite happy to make
changes if anyone has any specific complaints.

It might not be a bad idea to follow the suggestion made in one of the other
threads and repost the current set of logo candidates--both mine and 
sh4dou's--to the users' list and ask for votes/comments/other candidates
(after all, logo design doesn't require coding skills!), but I'm too tired to do
it tonight.