> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Darrell Anderson > <humanreadable@...> wrote: >>> > This should be cleared. Are we >>> going to port trinity to qt4 or don't. >>> > There are users in the IRC channel who ask about this, >>> and I don't >>> > really know how to respond, since it isn't clear to >>> myself. >>> > For what I understood: we won't port trinity to Qt4, we >>> will add >>> > possibility of using qt3 and qt4 together. Is this >>> correct? >>> >>> This is correct. At one time there was a desire to >>> port to Qt4, however >>> months of solid work showed that Qt4 cannot provide the >>> features needed to >>> create a fast, efficient desktop geared towards >>> mouse/keyboard interaction >>> and high on-screen information content. >> >> Okeydokey, but then what is the purpose of TQt? >> > You mean TQt, which is pretty much the same as Qt3 but with Q* objects > translated to TQ*. > > What I'd like to know is purporse of tqtinterface. > > Initially I understood it was created to facilitate porting to qt4, > without having to rewrite much of the tdelibs/tdecomponents code. But > now, that there are no plans for Qt4 port, what is it needed for, > except as compilation dependency? It currently allows you to select Qt3 or TQt3. Without it the TQt3 port would not have been possible. Tim