> On Monday 13 February 2012 10:59:10 Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> I have repeatedly asked him for
>> the technical reasons that he considers twin changes to have "broken"
>> it,
>> and I still do not have an answer.
> I pointed out to two incorrect commits in my very first mail to this
> mailing
> list. I have offered several times the help, I have told you that you can
> ask
> me any question about KWin. And now you complain that I never explained to
> you
> why the commits have broken KWin? Seriously you had enough time to ask,
> and I
> had expected that you would ask why it is wrong.
>
> Cheers
> Martin

Care to elaborate?  I am willing to listen.  Your original message was
disregarded to some extent as you linked to changes that were made on
purpose, and I usually expect people who claim something is wrong to make
an attempt at stating *why( they think said something is wrong.

Tim